Editorial Standards
Our commitment to accuracy, integrity, and transparent publishing in bowel health education.
At Holistic Health Recommend, we believe that readers deserve content built on rigorous research, expert input, and unwavering commitment to truth. This page outlines the principles that guide every article, guide, and recommendation we publish.
Our Editorial Principles
These five pillars shape how we research, write, and publish.
Evidence-Based Content
Every claim we publish is grounded in peer-reviewed research, clinical literature, and expert consensus. We cite primary sources and link to scientific evidence wherever possible. When evidence is emerging or limited, we say so explicitly.
Author Transparency
Every article includes a full author byline with credentials and expertise area. We disclose relevant professional affiliations and qualifications. Our readers know exactly who wrote what and why they are qualified to do so.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
We disclose any financial, professional, or personal relationships that could bias our coverage. We do not publish sponsored content or advertorial material without clear labeling. Readers can trust that our editorial voice is independent.
Independent Fact-Checking
Before publication, every article undergoes fact-checking by our editorial team. Statistical claims, study citations, and quoted expertise are verified against original sources. We maintain a documented process for all corrections and updates.
Balanced, Inclusive Perspective
We acknowledge different viewpoints in health and wellness while prioritising evidence. Our content serves diverse audiences and considers individual differences in age, background, and health status. We avoid one-size-fits-all claims.
Accessible, Honest Language
We explain complex medical and scientific concepts in plain language without oversimplifying. We use clear headings, definitions, and examples. We are honest about uncertainty and avoid sensationalism or fear-based framing.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Rigorous Verification at Every Stage
Research & Source Selection
Authors identify peer-reviewed journals, clinical guidelines, and expert sources relevant to the topic. We prioritise recent research and established medical authorities.
Citation & Evidence Linking
Every factual claim and statistic is linked to its source. Readers can follow citations back to original studies, reports, or expert statements to verify information independently.
Editorial Review
A second editor reviews the article for accuracy, clarity, and consistency with our standards. This person checks citations, verifies quotes, and flags any unclear or unsubstantiated statements.
Expert Consultation
For complex or sensitive topics, we consult with qualified health professionals to review content for accuracy and balance before publication.
What We Verify
- Statistical claims and percentages
- Study findings and research conclusions
- Expert quotes and attributions
- Medical terminology and definitions
- Links and references to original sources
- Author credentials and affiliations
Our Editorial Leadership
Meet the team of health professionals and writers who guide our editorial mission.
Sarah Mitchell
Editor-in-Chief
Dr. Mitchell holds a PhD in Nutritional Science from the University of Cambridge and has 12 years of clinical nutrition experience. She oversees all editorial strategy and fact-checking standards.
Prof. James Hartley
Medical Review Board Chair
A gastroenterologist with 20+ years in clinical practice and medical education, Prof. Hartley reviews all content relating to digestive health and ensures alignment with current clinical evidence.
Emma Richardson
Senior Health Writer
Emma is a registered dietitian and science journalist with expertise in translating complex health research into accessible content. She leads our article development and source verification.
Anil Patel
Scientific Advisor
Dr. Patel holds a PhD in Molecular Biology and serves as our primary consultant for evaluating emerging research and ensuring our coverage reflects the latest scientific understanding.
Corrections & Updates
Our Commitment to Accuracy
Despite our rigorous fact-checking process, errors can occur. We take responsibility for inaccuracies and correct them promptly and transparently. Readers help us maintain quality by reporting suspected errors.
How We Handle Corrections
-
Immediate Fix
Factual errors are corrected in the live article immediately upon discovery or verification.
-
Correction Notice
A visible note is added to the article explaining what was corrected and when, maintaining editorial transparency.
-
Archive & Documentation
We document all corrections in an internal log for accountability and to identify patterns in our publishing process.
-
Regular Updates
Articles are reviewed periodically and updated to reflect new research, clinical guidelines, or evolving understanding without changing the original publication date unless major updates warrant a new article.
Report an Error
If you've found an inaccuracy or have concerns about the factual content of an article, we welcome your feedback. Our editorial team reviews all submissions carefully.
We aim to respond to all submissions within 5 business days. Thank you for helping us maintain editorial integrity.
Questions About Our Standards
Our writers include registered dietitians, medical writers, health journalists, and subject-matter experts with relevant qualifications. Every author's credentials are listed on their article. We may also feature guest contributions from established health professionals and researchers, always with full disclosure of their background and any affiliations.
We prioritise recent, peer-reviewed research (ideally published within the last 5–10 years). However, we also reference established clinical guidelines and seminal studies that remain relevant. When citing older research, we verify it still represents current understanding or explicitly note if newer evidence has superseded it. For rapidly evolving topics, we update articles more frequently.
We welcome constructive feedback. If you believe an article misrepresents evidence, overlooks a viewpoint, or contains an error, please contact us via the feedback form on this page. We consider all legitimate concerns and may update the article or add a note acknowledging alternative perspectives supported by evidence.
For topics where evidence is mixed or expert opinion varies, we acknowledge the debate openly. We present multiple viewpoints fairly, cite the evidence for each position, and explain any limitations in current research. Our role is to inform readers, not to dismiss legitimate areas of scientific disagreement. Readers should understand the state of evidence and feel empowered to discuss options with their own healthcare provider.
No. Our articles provide evidence-based information to help readers understand health topics and make informed choices. They are not a substitute for personalised medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified healthcare professional. Readers should always consult their doctor or relevant professional before making significant health decisions or changes.
Trust Through Transparency
Our editorial standards exist to serve you—our reader. We are committed to publishing reliable, evidence-based information about bowel health and digestive wellness.
Frequently Asked Questions
We combine evidence-based medical research with holistic wellness principles. Our team of healthcare professionals reviews each recommendation to ensure it meets rigorous quality standards.
Yes. We follow strict editorial guidelines and do not accept payment for product placement. Our recommendations are based solely on efficacy, safety, and value for our readers.
Our content is educational and informational only. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making medical decisions or starting any new supplement or treatment regimen.
We continuously monitor new research and update our articles to reflect the latest scientific findings. Major updates are marked with publication dates for transparency.
We welcome reader questions and feedback. Use our contact form or email us directly. Our team reviews all inquiries and may feature your question in future articles.
Get in Touch
Have questions about our editorial process or content? We'd love to hear from you.
Online Platform
Accessible 24/7 worldwide
Email Support
Response within 48 hours
Availability
Monday–Friday, 9 AM–5 PM